« Burying Bokashi Compost in Raised Bed (2/2)
Dr. Nalini Nadkarni, Botany 2013 Plenary Address »
Greg Clarke interviews Professor John Lennox.
November 14, 2013 at 7:13 am (UTC 0)
and you are saying that an old dusty book has complete 100% proof of
everything oh wait don’t forget the hundred loopholes in the first half of
your magic book
November 14, 2013 at 8:08 am (UTC 0)
explain how we are no longer single cell organisms dumbshit
November 14, 2013 at 8:11 am (UTC 0)
don’t believe everything from a 2000 year old book with dodgy translation
November 14, 2013 at 8:23 am (UTC 0)
It’s absolutely and definetly NOT disproven that humans evolved from apes
the opposite is true we know definetly we DID evolve from apes in fact we
are still apes today. There are numerous transitional species in the fossil
record, perhaps you should actually look this up before posting since you
clearly have no idea what you’re talking about if all you’ve done is read
fraudulent creationist propaganda, there have been many observations of new
species evolving from other species today aswell.
November 14, 2013 at 8:54 am (UTC 0)
micro-evolution, which is change within a species is a fact.
macro-evolution, the belief that apes evolve into men, etc… is
dis-proven. nothing has ever been observed transitioning from one animal
into another, and this especially includes the fossil record. men evolve
into more men, monkeys evolve into more monkeys, but nothing evolves into
something other than what it was.
November 14, 2013 at 9:21 am (UTC 0)
Room for belief is different than a reason for it.
November 14, 2013 at 10:13 am (UTC 0)
So a troll it is.
November 14, 2013 at 10:52 am (UTC 0)
One of the reasons Antony Flew gave was that the church of England changed
it’s conception of hell. How does that in any way relate to modern biology?
The arguments he does give that are based on biology are arguments from
ignorance, which is to say he can’t see how it would happen so it must not
have happened that way. He should have known better. But we all get old I
suppose. And you Christians are so good at profiting from peoples moments
of weakness. Quite sickening really.
November 14, 2013 at 11:42 am (UTC 0)
It’s Antony Flew
November 14, 2013 at 12:41 pm (UTC 0)
I’m not a mind reader mate. The chain of the comment goes right to the top
with nary a mention of Anthony Flew, so the reasonable conclusion is that
he was talking about Lennox. Indeed the thread started with “Lennox sounds
all good until he starts on evolution”. Was I supposed to guess that this
Anthony Flew, who I have never heard of, was this great atheist mind
supposedly turned to theism?
November 14, 2013 at 1:36 pm (UTC 0)
You have to be a troll. No one could be that ignorant and operate a
Yes I misread that. Sorry about getting that wrong and loosing my shit to
to bullshit over exposure. But you still don’t know what the fuck you are
talking about, because evolution is falsifiable. This is because is makes
specific claims about how the world should be if it is correct, like any
physical theory. Claims which can and have been checked against reality.
November 14, 2013 at 2:27 pm (UTC 0)
‘Anguspure’ was referring to Anthony Flew, not John Lennox. How about
getting your facts straight first before making a counterargument.
November 14, 2013 at 3:09 pm (UTC 0)
I never claimed anything of the sort. If you read my post again, you’ll
realise it does not say what you thought it said.
November 14, 2013 at 3:23 pm (UTC 0)
My dog this guy just is talking out of his arsehole.
November 14, 2013 at 3:55 pm (UTC 0)
LOL Lennox was never an atheist, let alone one of the most influential
atheists of the 20th century. He has always been a Christian and a vocal
one at that.
November 14, 2013 at 4:35 pm (UTC 0)
You don’t know what the fuck you are talking about. Seriously. You don’t.
Evolution says absolutely nothing about a creator.
November 14, 2013 at 5:13 pm (UTC 0)
Except, there really doesn’t. Adding a something begs the even more
insolvable question of what is behind the something. Saying “it was always
there” is special pleading and less convincing than saying everything arose
without a something creating it.
November 14, 2013 at 5:58 pm (UTC 0)
It depends on what you mean by that. If you mean what do we know about how
things work in a general sense, then probably we are 90% of the way there.
If you mean, what are all the implications and have we described everything
extraordinary and surprising that exists in nature, then probably 1% is way
November 14, 2013 at 6:42 pm (UTC 0)
“nothing is science is 100% proven” yes, that’s the point. That is how you
know that you aren’t being had. Anyone that tells you they know something
100% is lying either to you or themselves. “showing us an animal, and then
show us the same animal but evolved.” That’s not evolution dude, it’s
Lamarckism. Well it would be the animal in question could pass it on. No.
Evolution occurs when the OFFSPRING of an animal differ, & some survive
better than others. We see this all the time in nature.
November 14, 2013 at 7:32 pm (UTC 0)
I like this guy.
November 14, 2013 at 8:11 pm (UTC 0)
to be honest dude. we probably know far less than 1% of all their is to
November 14, 2013 at 8:38 pm (UTC 0)
@sahadevaaa Math! Evidence! Do some research yourself or do you let people
like lennox tell you how to think?
November 14, 2013 at 8:56 pm (UTC 0)
He backs Siegfried Scherer, the young earth creationist who gave us the
“Giant floating forests” explanation of the origins of coal.
for full details.
November 14, 2013 at 9:35 pm (UTC 0)
@spacecowboy95 well- be intellectually honest and believe that we, and
everything around us came by chance and that soon scientists will find out
something to prove it
Your email address will not be published.
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>